- Parent topic
- PLC Reference: 3-101-4764
- Law stated as at: 15-May-2001
- Publication date: 19-Nov-2001
- Need to log in
- Legal update: archive
- Landlord and tenant
- Title issues
- Enforcement and remedies: land and buildings
- Easements, covenants and other third party rights
- PLC Property Law
- PLC Public Sector
Any highlighted text has been edited by the Practical Law Company and has not yet been approved by contributors.
Landlord's claim to adverse possession by tenantAdams v Batt, 11 May, 2001 (High Court).
In this case, the claimant was claiming adverse possession under the presumption in Kingsmill v Millard  11 Exch 313, that where a tenant encroaches on a third party's land, that encroachment enures for the benefit of the tenant's landlord, in the absence of evidence of contrary intention.
The High Court declined to decide on whether the scope of the Kingsmill presumption should be qualified but decided that not only did the tenant not have the requisite intention to possess the land to establish adverse possession, but that the operation of the presumption would have meant that any land acquired would have enured for the benefit of the landlord at the time the tenancy came to an end. The claimant had not been the landlord then and therefore had no claim.
Landlord and tenant
Enforcement and remedies: land and buildings
Easements, covenants and other third party rights
See also:Legal update: archive: